header-logo header-logo

22 September 2021
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-detail

Are e-signatures secure?

Ministers have launched an expert industry working group to boost public confidence in e-signatures

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) set up the group following a recommendation from the Law Commission. It will be chaired by Mr Justice Fraser, under the oversight of Lord Justice Birss, and assisted by Professor Sarah Green of the Law Commission alongside legal and industry experts. Its remit is to improve standards, reliability and security in e-signatures and other digital means of legally executing documents, and to look into best practice in this area.

It will analyse the use of different technologies for e-signatures, look at safeguards for video-witnessing of deeds, best practice guidance for e-signatures particularly where vulnerable adults execute documents electronically, consider the challenges involved in cross-border transactions and how best to protect signatories from fraud.

The group began meeting this summer and aims to produce an interim report by the end of 2021 setting out initial thoughts and recommendations for reform to the government.

In 2019, the Law Commission reported that while e-signatures are legally valid for most purposes, there is a lack of clarity and confidence around their use.

Meanwhile, MPs have launched a short inquiry into open justice and court reporting in the digital age.

The Justice Committee will look at how the media’s coverage of the courts has changed, focusing on the impact of technology and court reform and investigating potential barriers to ensuring proceedings remain transparent and accessible. It will consider opportunities for using digital technology to enhance open justice and the impact of social media on court reporting.

It is inviting written evidence, to be submitted by 18 October 2021, on how media coverage has changed, barriers to the media obtaining information, the impact of social media and the effect of court reform and remote hearings on open justice. Find out more here.

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll