header-logo header-logo

Are e-signatures secure?

22 September 2021
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-detail
Ministers have launched an expert industry working group to boost public confidence in e-signatures

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) set up the group following a recommendation from the Law Commission. It will be chaired by Mr Justice Fraser, under the oversight of Lord Justice Birss, and assisted by Professor Sarah Green of the Law Commission alongside legal and industry experts. Its remit is to improve standards, reliability and security in e-signatures and other digital means of legally executing documents, and to look into best practice in this area.

It will analyse the use of different technologies for e-signatures, look at safeguards for video-witnessing of deeds, best practice guidance for e-signatures particularly where vulnerable adults execute documents electronically, consider the challenges involved in cross-border transactions and how best to protect signatories from fraud.

The group began meeting this summer and aims to produce an interim report by the end of 2021 setting out initial thoughts and recommendations for reform to the government.

In 2019, the Law Commission reported that while e-signatures are legally valid for most purposes, there is a lack of clarity and confidence around their use.

Meanwhile, MPs have launched a short inquiry into open justice and court reporting in the digital age.

The Justice Committee will look at how the media’s coverage of the courts has changed, focusing on the impact of technology and court reform and investigating potential barriers to ensuring proceedings remain transparent and accessible. It will consider opportunities for using digital technology to enhance open justice and the impact of social media on court reporting.

It is inviting written evidence, to be submitted by 18 October 2021, on how media coverage has changed, barriers to the media obtaining information, the impact of social media and the effect of court reform and remote hearings on open justice. Find out more here.

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll