header-logo header-logo

22 September 2021
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-detail

Are e-signatures secure?

Ministers have launched an expert industry working group to boost public confidence in e-signatures

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) set up the group following a recommendation from the Law Commission. It will be chaired by Mr Justice Fraser, under the oversight of Lord Justice Birss, and assisted by Professor Sarah Green of the Law Commission alongside legal and industry experts. Its remit is to improve standards, reliability and security in e-signatures and other digital means of legally executing documents, and to look into best practice in this area.

It will analyse the use of different technologies for e-signatures, look at safeguards for video-witnessing of deeds, best practice guidance for e-signatures particularly where vulnerable adults execute documents electronically, consider the challenges involved in cross-border transactions and how best to protect signatories from fraud.

The group began meeting this summer and aims to produce an interim report by the end of 2021 setting out initial thoughts and recommendations for reform to the government.

In 2019, the Law Commission reported that while e-signatures are legally valid for most purposes, there is a lack of clarity and confidence around their use.

Meanwhile, MPs have launched a short inquiry into open justice and court reporting in the digital age.

The Justice Committee will look at how the media’s coverage of the courts has changed, focusing on the impact of technology and court reform and investigating potential barriers to ensuring proceedings remain transparent and accessible. It will consider opportunities for using digital technology to enhance open justice and the impact of social media on court reporting.

It is inviting written evidence, to be submitted by 18 October 2021, on how media coverage has changed, barriers to the media obtaining information, the impact of social media and the effect of court reform and remote hearings on open justice. Find out more here.

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll