header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Property , International
printer mail-detail

Are finders still keepers?

207996
Who owns lost treasures once they have been found? Michael L Nash unearths some peculiarities in the law of possession & ownership

On 6 February 1987, I wrote an article for NLJ under the heading of ‘Are Finders Keepers?’, 137 NLJ 118, based on the case of Elwes v Brigg Gas Co (33 Ch D 562) in 1885. Since then, a great deal has happened in the world of possession and ownership, on which this celebrated case was based. Could the owner of land own objects under the surface—sometimes a very long way under—of which they had no knowledge whatsoever? Or, in giving a lease to another to excavate, did what the lessee found belong to them, given that they had no knowledge either of what they did find, in course of their excavation?

Who owns what?

The property law of England became largely, though not entirely, the result of evolution, rather than revolution. The English, or the British perhaps, have always been loath to abandon anything quaint or whimsical,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll