header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Property , International
printer mail-detail

Are finders still keepers?

207996
Who owns lost treasures once they have been found? Michael L Nash unearths some peculiarities in the law of possession & ownership

On 6 February 1987, I wrote an article for NLJ under the heading of ‘Are Finders Keepers?’, 137 NLJ 118, based on the case of Elwes v Brigg Gas Co (33 Ch D 562) in 1885. Since then, a great deal has happened in the world of possession and ownership, on which this celebrated case was based. Could the owner of land own objects under the surface—sometimes a very long way under—of which they had no knowledge whatsoever? Or, in giving a lease to another to excavate, did what the lessee found belong to them, given that they had no knowledge either of what they did find, in course of their excavation?

Who owns what?

The property law of England became largely, though not entirely, the result of evolution, rather than revolution. The English, or the British perhaps, have always been loath to abandon anything quaint or whimsical,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll