header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007 / Helen Darling , Katherine Hill
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , EU , Wills & Probate , Banking
printer mail-detail

Are we there yet?

Is a coherent EU anti-money laundering approach to trusts within reach? ask Helen Darling and Katherine Hill

The passage of the Third European Money Laundering Directive 2005/60/EC (the Directive) into domestic law, scheduled for 15 December 2007, has not been as smooth as the government hoped. The first draft of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (the draft regulations) was published in January this year to widespread criticism from representative bodies including the Law Society and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. Concerns focused predominantly on the impact of Pt 2 of the draft regulations dealing with customer due diligence (CDD) and, particularly, a perceived failure to provide clarity on how CDD requirements apply to trusts.
Concerted lobbying by domestic bodies and, ultimately, intervention by the European Commission resulted in the definition of beneficial ownership contained in the draft regulations being significantly amended. In July 2007 the revised Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157) (the regulations) were published in what the government has stated is their final form. The changes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll