header-logo header-logo

Are we there yet?

20 September 2007 / Helen Darling , Katherine Hill
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , EU , Wills & Probate , Banking
printer mail-detail

Is a coherent EU anti-money laundering approach to trusts within reach? ask Helen Darling and Katherine Hill

The passage of the Third European Money Laundering Directive 2005/60/EC (the Directive) into domestic law, scheduled for 15 December 2007, has not been as smooth as the government hoped. The first draft of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (the draft regulations) was published in January this year to widespread criticism from representative bodies including the Law Society and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. Concerns focused predominantly on the impact of Pt 2 of the draft regulations dealing with customer due diligence (CDD) and, particularly, a perceived failure to provide clarity on how CDD requirements apply to trusts.
Concerted lobbying by domestic bodies and, ultimately, intervention by the European Commission resulted in the definition of beneficial ownership contained in the draft regulations being significantly amended. In July 2007 the revised Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157) (the regulations) were published in what the government has stated is their final form. The changes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll