header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Are you being serviced?

istock_000010743918medium_2

A recent High Court decision appears to sound another blow for landlords. Siobhan Jones reports

Residential service charges (and their recovery by landlords) are subject to extensive statutory regulation. In particular, ss 18 to 30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985), as amended principally by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002), operate to limit the recovery of the cost of certain works (qualifying works) via the service charge unless the landlord complies with a prescribed consultation process. In summary, the landlord must consult with tenants if the cost of qualifying works to the building ultimately payable by each tenant, will exceed £250.

Where qualifying works are anticipated the landlord must instigate the (relatively demanding) consultation process set out at ss 20 to 20ZA of LTA 1985. This involves the following steps:

  • Giving notice of intention to the individual tenants (and any tenants’ association) outlining the proposed qualifying works, why they are necessary and inviting written observations.
  • Considering any written observations received.
  • Seeking estimates for the proposed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll