header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Are you being serviced?

istock_000010743918medium_2

A recent High Court decision appears to sound another blow for landlords. Siobhan Jones reports

Residential service charges (and their recovery by landlords) are subject to extensive statutory regulation. In particular, ss 18 to 30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985), as amended principally by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002), operate to limit the recovery of the cost of certain works (qualifying works) via the service charge unless the landlord complies with a prescribed consultation process. In summary, the landlord must consult with tenants if the cost of qualifying works to the building ultimately payable by each tenant, will exceed £250.

Where qualifying works are anticipated the landlord must instigate the (relatively demanding) consultation process set out at ss 20 to 20ZA of LTA 1985. This involves the following steps:

  • Giving notice of intention to the individual tenants (and any tenants’ association) outlining the proposed qualifying works, why they are necessary and inviting written observations.
  • Considering any written observations received.
  • Seeking estimates for the proposed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll