header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Are you being serviced?

istock_000010743918medium_2

A recent High Court decision appears to sound another blow for landlords. Siobhan Jones reports

Residential service charges (and their recovery by landlords) are subject to extensive statutory regulation. In particular, ss 18 to 30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985), as amended principally by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002), operate to limit the recovery of the cost of certain works (qualifying works) via the service charge unless the landlord complies with a prescribed consultation process. In summary, the landlord must consult with tenants if the cost of qualifying works to the building ultimately payable by each tenant, will exceed £250.

Where qualifying works are anticipated the landlord must instigate the (relatively demanding) consultation process set out at ss 20 to 20ZA of LTA 1985. This involves the following steps:

  • Giving notice of intention to the individual tenants (and any tenants’ association) outlining the proposed qualifying works, why they are necessary and inviting written observations.
  • Considering any written observations received.
  • Seeking estimates for the proposed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll