header-logo header-logo

Are you being serviced?

08 February 2013 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail
istock_000010743918medium_2

A recent High Court decision appears to sound another blow for landlords. Siobhan Jones reports

Residential service charges (and their recovery by landlords) are subject to extensive statutory regulation. In particular, ss 18 to 30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985), as amended principally by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002), operate to limit the recovery of the cost of certain works (qualifying works) via the service charge unless the landlord complies with a prescribed consultation process. In summary, the landlord must consult with tenants if the cost of qualifying works to the building ultimately payable by each tenant, will exceed £250.

Where qualifying works are anticipated the landlord must instigate the (relatively demanding) consultation process set out at ss 20 to 20ZA of LTA 1985. This involves the following steps:

  • Giving notice of intention to the individual tenants (and any tenants’ association) outlining the proposed qualifying works, why they are necessary and inviting written observations.
  • Considering any written observations received.
  • Seeking estimates for the proposed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll