header-logo header-logo

Are you being serviced?

08 February 2013 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail
istock_000010743918medium_2

A recent High Court decision appears to sound another blow for landlords. Siobhan Jones reports

Residential service charges (and their recovery by landlords) are subject to extensive statutory regulation. In particular, ss 18 to 30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985), as amended principally by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002), operate to limit the recovery of the cost of certain works (qualifying works) via the service charge unless the landlord complies with a prescribed consultation process. In summary, the landlord must consult with tenants if the cost of qualifying works to the building ultimately payable by each tenant, will exceed £250.

Where qualifying works are anticipated the landlord must instigate the (relatively demanding) consultation process set out at ss 20 to 20ZA of LTA 1985. This involves the following steps:

  • Giving notice of intention to the individual tenants (and any tenants’ association) outlining the proposed qualifying works, why they are necessary and inviting written observations.
  • Considering any written observations received.
  • Seeking estimates for the proposed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll