header-logo header-logo

03 June 2016 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Arresting developments

nlj_7701_herring

Jonathan Herring investigates what behaviour amounts to harassment

Normally when a court order is breached an individual will face sanctions for contempt of court. However, the position in relation to non-molestation orders made under the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) is a little different. Section 42A of FLA 1996 makes it a criminal offence to breach such an order. This provision was designed to enhance protection to victims of domestic violence by placing responsibility for enforcement in the hands of the police, rather than depending on the victim bring proceedings herself. In particular it was designed to address the concern that a victim of domestic abuse might be threatened by the abuser into not to bringing contempt proceedings.

The facts of O’Neill

In R v O’Neill [2016] EWCA Crim 92, [2016] All ER (D) 216 (Mar) the Court of Appeal had to determine what kinds of breach of a non-molestation order might constitute an offence. Section 42A itself states that any breach of the order amounts to an offence. However, following this decision it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll