header-logo header-logo

Artificial intelligence: is the UK falling behind?

211153
The transformative potential of AI is undeniable, but so are its risks: Robert Taylor explains why the UK must act now to legislate
  • While the US, EU, and China have all taken significant steps to regulate artificial intelligence (AI), the UK has yet to introduce a dedicated AI regulatory framework.
  • Robust legislation is essential to safeguard individual rights, foster business confidence, and maintain global competitiveness.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, reshaping global economies, and altering the way individuals interact with technology. From healthcare to finance, AI-driven systems are enhancing efficiency, improving decision-making, and providing innovative solutions to complex problems.

However, these advancements also bring significant risks, including privacy violations, bias, algorithmic discrimination, cybersecurity threats, and ethical concerns. As the global AI race intensifies, governments worldwide are recognising the need for comprehensive legislative frameworks to regulate its development and application. The US, the EU, and China have all taken significant steps to regulate AI, aiming to harness its benefits while mitigating its risks.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll