header-logo header-logo

Artificial intelligence: is the UK falling behind?

211153
The transformative potential of AI is undeniable, but so are its risks: Robert Taylor explains why the UK must act now to legislate
  • While the US, EU, and China have all taken significant steps to regulate artificial intelligence (AI), the UK has yet to introduce a dedicated AI regulatory framework.
  • Robust legislation is essential to safeguard individual rights, foster business confidence, and maintain global competitiveness.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming industries, reshaping global economies, and altering the way individuals interact with technology. From healthcare to finance, AI-driven systems are enhancing efficiency, improving decision-making, and providing innovative solutions to complex problems.

However, these advancements also bring significant risks, including privacy violations, bias, algorithmic discrimination, cybersecurity threats, and ethical concerns. As the global AI race intensifies, governments worldwide are recognising the need for comprehensive legislative frameworks to regulate its development and application. The US, the EU, and China have all taken significant steps to regulate AI, aiming to harness its benefits while mitigating its risks.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll