header-logo header-logo

Asylum seeker—Age—Determination

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of PM) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 28 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Hickinbottom J, 4 August 2010

A local authority charged with obligations to children under ss 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989 is not bound by a simple finding of fact by the First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (FTT) as to the age of an applicant for support.

Christopher Buttler (instructed by Steel & Shamash) for the claimant. Holly Stout (instructed by Kathryn Pettitt) for the defendant.

In April 2010, following a finding of the FTT in the course of an asylum appeal that the claimant was over 18 years old, the defendant local authority withdrew the accommodation and other support it had made available to the claimant as a child since November 2008. The claimant applied for judicial review of that withdrawal, contending that, in the absence of a proper and reasoned reassessment of the claimant’s age by the authority to withdraw the services, the authority was in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll