header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Asylum seeker—Age—Determination

R (on the application of PM) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 28 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Hickinbottom J, 4 August 2010

A local authority charged with obligations to children under ss 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989 is not bound by a simple finding of fact by the First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (FTT) as to the age of an applicant for support.

Christopher Buttler (instructed by Steel & Shamash) for the claimant. Holly Stout (instructed by Kathryn Pettitt) for the defendant.

In April 2010, following a finding of the FTT in the course of an asylum appeal that the claimant was over 18 years old, the defendant local authority withdrew the accommodation and other support it had made available to the claimant as a child since November 2008. The claimant applied for judicial review of that withdrawal, contending that, in the absence of a proper and reasoned reassessment of the claimant’s age by the authority to withdraw the services, the authority was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll