header-logo header-logo

Auto-renewing contracts: stuck in the middle

12 September 2019 / Rob Jones , Jenny Young , Matthew Fox
Issue: 7855 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rob Jones, Jenny Young & Matthew Fox report on the dangers of auto-renewing contracts for medium & large businesses

  • The traps presented by auto-renewing contracts, and how to avoid them.

Auto-renewing contracts—otherwise known as rolling contracts—are contracts which automatically renew after an initial fixed period. The exact terms will vary from contract to contract. Typically, they state that if notice to terminate is not given in a specified period of time, and in a particular way, then the contract will automatically renew.

As a result, if the signing party fails to hand in their notice in line with the terms of the contract, they may find that they have unintentionally entered into a renewed contract even though they did not provide their explicit consent.

Some consider these types of contracts to be convenient as they enable services to continue uninterrupted without the need to renew. However, for others who want to switch to a cheaper or better provider, it will be an unpleasant surprise to discover that they are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll