header-logo header-logo

Auto-renewing contracts: stuck in the middle

12 September 2019 / Rob Jones , Jenny Young , Matthew Fox
Issue: 7855 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rob Jones, Jenny Young & Matthew Fox report on the dangers of auto-renewing contracts for medium & large businesses

  • The traps presented by auto-renewing contracts, and how to avoid them.

Auto-renewing contracts—otherwise known as rolling contracts—are contracts which automatically renew after an initial fixed period. The exact terms will vary from contract to contract. Typically, they state that if notice to terminate is not given in a specified period of time, and in a particular way, then the contract will automatically renew.

As a result, if the signing party fails to hand in their notice in line with the terms of the contract, they may find that they have unintentionally entered into a renewed contract even though they did not provide their explicit consent.

Some consider these types of contracts to be convenient as they enable services to continue uninterrupted without the need to renew. However, for others who want to switch to a cheaper or better provider, it will be an unpleasant surprise to discover that they are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll