header-logo header-logo

Auto-renewing contracts: stuck in the middle

12 September 2019 / Rob Jones , Jenny Young , Matthew Fox
Issue: 7855 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rob Jones, Jenny Young & Matthew Fox report on the dangers of auto-renewing contracts for medium & large businesses

  • The traps presented by auto-renewing contracts, and how to avoid them.

Auto-renewing contracts—otherwise known as rolling contracts—are contracts which automatically renew after an initial fixed period. The exact terms will vary from contract to contract. Typically, they state that if notice to terminate is not given in a specified period of time, and in a particular way, then the contract will automatically renew.

As a result, if the signing party fails to hand in their notice in line with the terms of the contract, they may find that they have unintentionally entered into a renewed contract even though they did not provide their explicit consent.

Some consider these types of contracts to be convenient as they enable services to continue uninterrupted without the need to renew. However, for others who want to switch to a cheaper or better provider, it will be an unpleasant surprise to discover that they are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll