header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020 / Daniel Maine
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail

Avoiding an intermeddling muddle

34273
Revised guidelines give greater clarity on when intermeddling will be prosecuted, as Daniel Maine reports
  • The intermeddling offence: imposing criminal liability.

Unlike a number of other jurisdictions, in Jersey it is a criminal offence to take possession of or in any way administer the movable estate of a deceased person prior to a grant of probate being obtained (the intermeddling offence). Her Majesty’s Attorney General (HMAG) is responsible for deciding whether to commence criminal proceedings in Jersey, including for the intermeddling offence.

The need to comply with Jersey’s probate requirements was underscored by the recent convictions of two financial services firms for intermeddling. Against that background, it is welcome that, with effect from April 2020, HMAG has issued revised guidelines on the intermeddling offence (the guidelines) that:

  • clarify when the Registrar of Probate (Registrar) must refer a case of suspected intermeddling to HMAG; and
  • provide financial services businesses with guidance on the public interest factors that HMAG will apply when deciding whether to prosecute.

The guidelines do not suggest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll