header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020 / Daniel Maine
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail

Avoiding an intermeddling muddle

34273
Revised guidelines give greater clarity on when intermeddling will be prosecuted, as Daniel Maine reports
  • The intermeddling offence: imposing criminal liability.

Unlike a number of other jurisdictions, in Jersey it is a criminal offence to take possession of or in any way administer the movable estate of a deceased person prior to a grant of probate being obtained (the intermeddling offence). Her Majesty’s Attorney General (HMAG) is responsible for deciding whether to commence criminal proceedings in Jersey, including for the intermeddling offence.

The need to comply with Jersey’s probate requirements was underscored by the recent convictions of two financial services firms for intermeddling. Against that background, it is welcome that, with effect from April 2020, HMAG has issued revised guidelines on the intermeddling offence (the guidelines) that:

  • clarify when the Registrar of Probate (Registrar) must refer a case of suspected intermeddling to HMAG; and
  • provide financial services businesses with guidance on the public interest factors that HMAG will apply when deciding whether to prosecute.

The guidelines do not suggest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll