header-logo header-logo

22 October 2020 / HHJ Karen Walden-Smith
Issue: 7907 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Awarding costs: Being held to account

30002
When awarding costs on account, what is a reasonable sum, asks HHJ Karen Walden-Smith

In brief

  • A change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs.
  • A specific, and very important, area of costs awards which has recently been engaging greater attention of the courts is the award of a payment on account of costs pursuant to the provisions of rule 44.2(8). CPR 44.2(8).

One of the major abiding features of the Civil Procedure Rules has been the change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs. The general rule that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party (CPR 44.2 (2)(a)) has been significantly adjusted to allow the court a much greater discretion in order to give proper weight to issues of conduct, both before and during the proceedings; whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll