header-logo header-logo

Awarding costs: Being held to account

22 October 2020 / HHJ Karen Walden-Smith
Issue: 7907 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
30002
When awarding costs on account, what is a reasonable sum, asks HHJ Karen Walden-Smith

In brief

  • A change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs.
  • A specific, and very important, area of costs awards which has recently been engaging greater attention of the courts is the award of a payment on account of costs pursuant to the provisions of rule 44.2(8). CPR 44.2(8).

One of the major abiding features of the Civil Procedure Rules has been the change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs. The general rule that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party (CPR 44.2 (2)(a)) has been significantly adjusted to allow the court a much greater discretion in order to give proper weight to issues of conduct, both before and during the proceedings; whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll