header-logo header-logo

Awarding costs: Being held to account

22 October 2020 / HHJ Karen Walden-Smith
Issue: 7907 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
30002
When awarding costs on account, what is a reasonable sum, asks HHJ Karen Walden-Smith

In brief

  • A change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs.
  • A specific, and very important, area of costs awards which has recently been engaging greater attention of the courts is the award of a payment on account of costs pursuant to the provisions of rule 44.2(8). CPR 44.2(8).

One of the major abiding features of the Civil Procedure Rules has been the change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs. The general rule that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party (CPR 44.2 (2)(a)) has been significantly adjusted to allow the court a much greater discretion in order to give proper weight to issues of conduct, both before and during the proceedings; whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll