header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bach backs ‘right to justice’ law

The Bach Commission has urged political parties of all hues to back a new Right to Justice Act that would guarantee minimum standards on access to justice.

In its final report, published this week, the commission, chaired by former Justice minister Lord Willy Bach, warned the poorest in society are being failed by a two-tier system, with thousands effectively cut off from legal advice and representation.

The proposed Act would codify existing rights to justice and establish a new right for individuals to receive reasonable legal assistance without costs they cannot afford. A Justice Commission would be created to monitor and enforce this right, and a set of principles established to guide interpretation of the right.

‘There is too much ambiguity and therefore too much discretion about what our right to justice means in practice, as the supreme court judgment on employment tribunal fees recently acknowledged,’ the commission states in the report.

‘We believe that a single, statute-based right to justice will bring the clarity necessary to reset our justice system and ensure that everyone can access justice.’

The commission called for an urgent review of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, which abolished legal aid for large areas of civil and family law in 2013)-something consecutive governments have promised but so far failed to deliver.

And it set out a plan for immediate action, including: widening the scope of legal aid; replacing the Legal Aid Agency with an independent body; and improving the public’s understanding of the law.

‘No person should be denied justice simply because they cannot afford it,’ said Lord Bach, who began work on the report in 2015.

‘We need a new Act which defends and extends the right to justice, and we need a new body tasked with implementing it. The government must take urgent action to address the crisis in our justice system. This means broadening the scope of legal aid, reforming eligibility requirements and taking action to improve the public’s understanding of the law.’

The report also proposed: ensuring all benefit recipients automatically qualify for legal aid; restoring legal aid for all matters concerning legal support for children; simplification of legal aid administration; and the re-establishment of early legal advice, particularly for family law.

Andrew Harrop, general secretary of the Fabian Society, which acted as secretariat to the commission, said: ‘This report sets out a radical new approach to fix the crisis in the justice system.’

Richard Burgon MP, Shadow Justice Secretary, commended Lord Bach’s work and said he backed ‘the idea of a new legally enforceable Right to Justice, that would guarantee access just as we have for healthcare and education’.

He said Labour would bring forward detailed plans on how it would implement Lord Bach’s recommendations in government.

The Law Society also welcomed the report. ‘If people cannot access advice or protect their rights, then effectively those rights do not exist,’ said Law Society vice-president Christina Blacklaws.

According to figures obtained by the Fabian Society, LASPO aimed to save £450m per year when it was introduced but last year’s legal aid spend was £950m less than in 2010. It estimates that the costs of the proposals in Lord Bach’s report will be about an additional £400m per year.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll