header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bach’s big idea welcome

nlj_7763_robins

Commission urges all parties to support a Right to Justice Act

Lawyers have given a warm welcome to the Bach Commission’s final report on access to justice, which calls for a ‘right to justice’ to be enshrined in law.

Former Justice minister Lord Bach, who headed the commission, urged all parties to support a Right to Justice Act that would create a new right for individuals ‘to receive reasonable legal assistance without costs they cannot afford’.

Andrew Langdon QC, Bar Council chair, said: ‘Lord Bach makes the important point that the rule of law and legal rights do not mean much unless citizens are able, through the legal system, to have them upheld, and that cuts to legal aid have made that impossible for many, especially the most vulnerable in society.’

CILEx President Milicent Grant said the report showed ‘ambitious thinking’, and highlighted the essential need for ‘a well-functioning market of independent legal service providers’ to achieve meaningful access to justice.

Writing in NLJ this week, columnist Jon Robins notes that the proportion of the population eligible for legal aid fell from eight out of 10 people in 1980 to less than one third of the population in 2007, and now stands at about one in five of us.

Lord Bach calls on the government to conduct its long-awaited review of LASPO which cut legal aid for large areas of civil and family law in 2013.

Robins says: ‘The report recommends introducing early legal help to pre-LASPO levels across the board and makes the case for widening scope to include all matters concerning children, as well as reinstating legal aid for areas of family law and immigration law. It proposes public funding for bereaved families in inquests and scrapping rules limiting funding for judicial review.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll