header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bach’s big idea

Jon Robins welcomes Lord Bach’s proposal to put legal advice on a par with the right to free healthcare & education

There are many recommendations in the long-awaited report of the Bach Commission on Access to Justice published last week; but there is one big idea: ‘a new legally enforceable right to justice’. Coming after a number of post-LASPO (Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act) reports in recent months—ironically, the government’s own review of its legislation remains nowhere in sight—Lord Willy Bach and his fellow commissioners needed ‘a big idea’ to stand out from the crowd.

It is often said that legal aid is ‘a pillar of the welfare state’. If that’s true, our system of publicly-funded law has become so enfeebled that it is no longer load-bearing. The introduction of a right to justice is compelling because it re-establishes the connection between our system of legal aid to the principles upon which the welfare state was built.

The proportion of the population eligible for legal aid collapsed from eight out of 10

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll