header-logo header-logo

Bad law

02 October 2014 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Opinion , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
commentbevan

Nicholas Bevan suspects an unconstitutional influence from insurers in the motor insurance sector

In June this year the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 1999 was subjected to judicial scrutiny and found wanting ((see Second Sight article on Delaney v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] EWHC 1785 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 31 (Jun)). The Department for Transport (DfT) was exposed for introducing an exclusion of liability clause that flouted the minimum standards of compensatory protection required under the European motor insurance directives and it was ordered to recompense a seriously injured passenger whom the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) had refused to compensate.

One of the most notable features of this case was the DfT’s apparently insouciant disregard of Community law. Its officials were unable, or unwilling, to explain why it had authorised a clause that even in 1999 amounted to a clear and obvious breach of the minimum standards of compensatory protection imposed under the Motor Insurance Directives.

The motor insurance sector is a highly profitable multibillion pound industry. It operates in an artificial market

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll