header-logo header-logo

05 August 2011 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

A balancing act

Halsbury's Law Exhange blogger Simon Hetherington on the inidividual liberty of terrorism suspects

"The see-saw on which are perched, at opposite ends, the interests of security and those of individual liberty has tilted a little in favour of the former.

There are problems, it appears, concerning the emergency extension of custody limits of suspects in terrorism investigations. The scenario is that periods might be increased from 14 days to up to 28, (though not, so far at least, to the controversial figure of 42).

A couple of months ago the Home Secretary warned Parliament that it would have to consider the problem of how to extend those limits in cases of urgent need, without discussing the cases themselves. Now, in addition, there is the concern that the time at which the granting of such an extension is necessary might fall when Parliament is not sitting.

These are two serious problems. Or at least they are serious problems once the premise beneath them is accepted, that the investigation of terrorist offences takes precedence over the individual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll