header-logo header-logo

05 August 2011 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

A balancing act

Halsbury's Law Exhange blogger Simon Hetherington on the inidividual liberty of terrorism suspects

"The see-saw on which are perched, at opposite ends, the interests of security and those of individual liberty has tilted a little in favour of the former.

There are problems, it appears, concerning the emergency extension of custody limits of suspects in terrorism investigations. The scenario is that periods might be increased from 14 days to up to 28, (though not, so far at least, to the controversial figure of 42).

A couple of months ago the Home Secretary warned Parliament that it would have to consider the problem of how to extend those limits in cases of urgent need, without discussing the cases themselves. Now, in addition, there is the concern that the time at which the granting of such an extension is necessary might fall when Parliament is not sitting.

These are two serious problems. Or at least they are serious problems once the premise beneath them is accepted, that the investigation of terrorist offences takes precedence over the individual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll