header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7475

19 July 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Halsbury's Law Exhange blogger Simon Hetherington on the inidividual liberty of terrorism suspects

Dominic Regan spills the beans on Jackson implementation (& beyond)

What’s the Human Rights Act ever done for us, asks Roger Smith

David Corker responds to the criminal cartel offence reform proposals

John McMullen considers if TUPE is alive & well

Does MK v CK mark a new start for child relocation, asks Jonathan Herring

Anthony Sullivan reviews the duties of motorists to pedestrians

Are pre-packs in the property industry a friend or foe, asks Siobhan Jones

Mark Johnson examines the impact of the controversial Health & Social Care Bill on charities & social enterprises

Craig Barlow & Aidan Briggs consider Bonhoeffer & hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll