header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7475

19 July 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Halsbury's Law Exhange blogger Simon Hetherington on the inidividual liberty of terrorism suspects

Dominic Regan spills the beans on Jackson implementation (& beyond)

What’s the Human Rights Act ever done for us, asks Roger Smith

David Corker responds to the criminal cartel offence reform proposals

John McMullen considers if TUPE is alive & well

Does MK v CK mark a new start for child relocation, asks Jonathan Herring

Anthony Sullivan reviews the duties of motorists to pedestrians

Are pre-packs in the property industry a friend or foe, asks Siobhan Jones

Mark Johnson examines the impact of the controversial Health & Social Care Bill on charities & social enterprises

Craig Barlow & Aidan Briggs consider Bonhoeffer & hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll