header-logo header-logo

21 July 2011 / John McMullen
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

The golden goose?

John McMullen considers if TUPE is alive & well

Recent months have seen vigorous debates about the policy aspects of protection of employees’ rights on business transfers and outsourcing, as well as the usual crop of case law. We take the opportunity to analyse these in this article.

Death of the codes of practice?

In relation to public sector outsourcing, the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE), are supplemented by codes of practice. The primary source is the cabinet office guidance on Staff Transfers in the Public Sector (COSOP), originally dated January 2000 but revised in November 2007. An important aspect of COSOP is Annex A, which deals with pensions: Staff Transfers from Central Government: A Fair Deal for Staff Pensions: Guidance to Departments and Agencies (HM Treasury, 1999) (the Fair Deal policy). This obliges contractors to make broadly similar pension provision to that available from the previous public sector employer. The broad similarity of the contractor’s provision has traditionally been tested by the award

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll