header-logo header-logo

The golden goose?

21 July 2011 / John McMullen
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

John McMullen considers if TUPE is alive & well

Recent months have seen vigorous debates about the policy aspects of protection of employees’ rights on business transfers and outsourcing, as well as the usual crop of case law. We take the opportunity to analyse these in this article.

Death of the codes of practice?

In relation to public sector outsourcing, the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE), are supplemented by codes of practice. The primary source is the cabinet office guidance on Staff Transfers in the Public Sector (COSOP), originally dated January 2000 but revised in November 2007. An important aspect of COSOP is Annex A, which deals with pensions: Staff Transfers from Central Government: A Fair Deal for Staff Pensions: Guidance to Departments and Agencies (HM Treasury, 1999) (the Fair Deal policy). This obliges contractors to make broadly similar pension provision to that available from the previous public sector employer. The broad similarity of the contractor’s provision has traditionally been tested by the award

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll