header-logo header-logo

21 July 2011 / Mark Johnson
Issue: 7475 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A clean bill of health

Mark Johnson examines the impact of the controversial Health & Social Care Bill on charities & social enterprises

In the biggest shake-up of the NHS since its inception, 151 primary care trusts (PCTs) and 10 strategic health authorities will go and 24,500 manager posts will be lost. The reforms are expected to cost £1.4bn to implement according to government estimates (others have said nearer £3bn), but are expected to save £5bn by the end of 2014/15, principally through a 33% saving in administrative costs. The government’s “pause and listen” exercise during June resulted in some cosmetic changes to the Bill, but the broad thrust of the proposals remains the same.

And change is already underway, even though the Bill is not expected to become law until December 2011. In future, it will be lean and nimble providers who prosper. They will need to know how to design services which appeal to new “customers”—clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) led and owned by GPs but with representation on their board from nurses, hospital doctors and lay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll