header-logo header-logo

david_corker_bw

David Corker

Partner

David Corker, partner, Corker Binning (dc@corkerbinning.comwww.corkerbinning.com)

Partner

David Corker, partner, Corker Binning (dc@corkerbinning.comwww.corkerbinning.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
The fraud review & a starter for ten…David Corker provides Jonathan Fisher KC with some useful pointers

The authorities muster their forces to tackle ‘dirty money’. David Corker remains unimpressed

A year into post the Lord Chief Justice has drawn his battle lines, says David Corker

David Corker considers the implications of ditching dishonesty from the criminal cartel offence

Are warrants worth the paper they’re written on, asks David Corker

David Corker studies the events that led up to the SFO’s recent backtrack

Should the SFO rush in to prosecute banks over LIBOR, asks David Corker

Are the MoJ’s claims about DPAs more mythical than real, asks David Corker

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll