header-logo header-logo

Why UWOs & tax evasion are not what really matter

25 May 2018 / David Corker
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7794_corker

The authorities muster their forces to tackle ‘dirty money’. David Corker remains unimpressed

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA) is the most significant criminal fraud statute for many years. While the Criminal Justice Act 2003 affected criminal law changes in relation to hearsay, bad character and disclosure, there was no specific focus on fraud. Although the Fraud Act 2006 and the Bribery Act 2010 are noteworthy, their effects are limited. The former was enacted partly to abolish recourse to the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud, an enduring Serious Fraud Office (SFO) favourite. The bribery statute, a key milestone in the expanded model of corporate criminal liability, is otherwise narrowly focused.

Unexplained wealth orders

Chapter 1 of Part 1 and Part 3 of the CFA are key provisions. The former concerns unexplained wealth orders (UWOs). Within a month of being implemented, the National Crime Agency proclaimed that it had obtained two of these. Part 3 concerns the new corporate criminal offence: facilitation of tax evasion. Only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll