header-logo header-logo

Why UWOs & tax evasion are not what really matter

25 May 2018 / David Corker
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7794_corker

The authorities muster their forces to tackle ‘dirty money’. David Corker remains unimpressed

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA) is the most significant criminal fraud statute for many years. While the Criminal Justice Act 2003 affected criminal law changes in relation to hearsay, bad character and disclosure, there was no specific focus on fraud. Although the Fraud Act 2006 and the Bribery Act 2010 are noteworthy, their effects are limited. The former was enacted partly to abolish recourse to the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud, an enduring Serious Fraud Office (SFO) favourite. The bribery statute, a key milestone in the expanded model of corporate criminal liability, is otherwise narrowly focused.

Unexplained wealth orders

Chapter 1 of Part 1 and Part 3 of the CFA are key provisions. The former concerns unexplained wealth orders (UWOs). Within a month of being implemented, the National Crime Agency proclaimed that it had obtained two of these. Part 3 concerns the new corporate criminal offence: facilitation of tax evasion. Only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll