header-logo header-logo

Why UWOs & tax evasion are not what really matter

25 May 2018 / David Corker
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7794_corker

The authorities muster their forces to tackle ‘dirty money’. David Corker remains unimpressed

The Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA) is the most significant criminal fraud statute for many years. While the Criminal Justice Act 2003 affected criminal law changes in relation to hearsay, bad character and disclosure, there was no specific focus on fraud. Although the Fraud Act 2006 and the Bribery Act 2010 are noteworthy, their effects are limited. The former was enacted partly to abolish recourse to the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud, an enduring Serious Fraud Office (SFO) favourite. The bribery statute, a key milestone in the expanded model of corporate criminal liability, is otherwise narrowly focused.

Unexplained wealth orders

Chapter 1 of Part 1 and Part 3 of the CFA are key provisions. The former concerns unexplained wealth orders (UWOs). Within a month of being implemented, the National Crime Agency proclaimed that it had obtained two of these. Part 3 concerns the new corporate criminal offence: facilitation of tax evasion. Only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll