21 July 2011 / Craig Barlow , Aidan Briggs

Issue: 7475 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice

printer

mail-detail

Pure & simple?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Craig Barlow & Aidan Briggs consider Bonhoeffer & hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings

Whichever professional reads this article, either they or their clients’ activities are policed by a disciplinary body and its procedural rules—be they statutory, contractual or otherwise. Somewhere in the depths of most of those rules lurks a procedural mechanism that prima facie authorises the admission of “hearsay” evidence.

In R (Bonhoeffer) v The General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 141 (Jun), the General Medical Council’s (GMC) fitness to practice panel (FTPP) decided after much argument to admit crucial and controversial “hearsay” evidence against the defendant. The court quashed that decision, relying upon common law “fairness” and Art 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The implications of the Bonhoeffer decision for the interpretation, application and use of such hearsay rules or provisions before disciplinary bodies are profound and reach far beyond the GMC.

Bonhoeffer

Bonhoeffer was a long standing and eminent consultant paediatric cardiologist of repute. He stood accused of eight allegations

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Pure & simple?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Craig Barlow & Aidan Briggs consider Bonhoeffer & hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings

Whichever professional reads this article, either they or their clients’ activities are policed by a disciplinary body and its procedural rules—be they statutory, contractual or otherwise. Somewhere in the depths of most of those rules lurks a procedural mechanism that prima facie authorises the admission of “hearsay” evidence.

In R (Bonhoeffer) v The General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 141 (Jun), the General Medical Council’s (GMC) fitness to practice panel (FTPP) decided after much argument to admit crucial and controversial “hearsay” evidence against the defendant. The court quashed that decision, relying upon common law “fairness” and Art 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The implications of the Bonhoeffer decision for the interpretation, application and use of such hearsay rules or provisions before disciplinary bodies are profound and reach far beyond the GMC.

Bonhoeffer

Bonhoeffer was a long standing and eminent consultant paediatric cardiologist of repute. He stood accused of eight allegations

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

back-to-top-scroll