header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bank

Dexia Crediop S.p.A. v Comune Di Prato [2017] EWCA Civ 428, [2017] All ER (D) 86 (Jun)

The Court of Appeal allowed the claimant bank’s appeal against the judge’s decisions, upholding the defendant Italian local authority’s defences to claimant’s claim for money owing under interest rate swap. The defendant had had capacity to enter the swaps, its financial defences failed, as the mandatory rules of Italian law had no application to the swaps and it had not been entitled to counterclaim for damages on the basis of a statutory tort arising from the claimant’s alleged breaches of its obligations.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll