header-logo header-logo

06 September 2024 / Jonathan Bennett , James Davies
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Banking
printer mail-detail

Banks, lenders & the doctrine of purview

188090
James Davies & Jonathan Bennett delve into this intricate & often misunderstood legal principle—as well as its impact on lenders
  • The doctrine of purview, a nuanced legal principle in the law of guarantees, plays a critical role in enforcement attempts against debtors, particularly guarantors, under a mortgage.
  • This article examines key decisions by the English courts, the doctrine’s limits, and its practical implications for lenders.
  • It explores the doctrine’s potential as a line of defence in summary judgment applications and bankruptcy proceedings, and offers strategies for lenders to mitigate risks.

There is a legal principle known as the ‘doctrine of the purview’ in the law of guarantees, and it can have an effect on enforcement attempts against debtors (principally any guarantors) under a mortgage. Therefore, for banks and other lenders, and their advisors, it is a doctrine that they should at least be aware of—and in certain circumstances should consider carefully.

While there are several key decisions by the English courts in which the doctrine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll