header-logo header-logo

06 September 2024 / Jonathan Bennett , James Davies
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Banking
printer mail-detail

Banks, lenders & the doctrine of purview

188090
James Davies & Jonathan Bennett delve into this intricate & often misunderstood legal principle—as well as its impact on lenders
  • The doctrine of purview, a nuanced legal principle in the law of guarantees, plays a critical role in enforcement attempts against debtors, particularly guarantors, under a mortgage.
  • This article examines key decisions by the English courts, the doctrine’s limits, and its practical implications for lenders.
  • It explores the doctrine’s potential as a line of defence in summary judgment applications and bankruptcy proceedings, and offers strategies for lenders to mitigate risks.

There is a legal principle known as the ‘doctrine of the purview’ in the law of guarantees, and it can have an effect on enforcement attempts against debtors (principally any guarantors) under a mortgage. Therefore, for banks and other lenders, and their advisors, it is a doctrine that they should at least be aware of—and in certain circumstances should consider carefully.

While there are several key decisions by the English courts in which the doctrine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll