header-logo header-logo

Banks squeeze out businesses

28 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The banks’ imposition of business support measures on small to medium-sized business have gone awry, a banking lawyer has warned.
 

Writing in this week’s NLJ, barrister Aidan Briggs of Ely Place Chambers, highlights issues identified by two recent banking reports. For example, perverse incentives to push viable businesses into solvency may be at work due to increased margins and fees, while lenders engineer “distress” in businesses by restricting credit or revaluing assets and then accelerate the decline by imposing dramatic changes to lending terms.

Briggs offers advice to clients of banks on how to resist such treatment, for example, some contracts expressly provide that the bank exercise certain powers only in a “commercially reasonable manner”. Secured lenders also owe an equitable duty of good faith, and may not act in a way that unfairly prejudices the mortgagor, for example, by holding a “firesale” valuation.
 

Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll