header-logo header-logo

20 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar Council calls for pay parity

Bar Council calls on DPP to address pay ‘iniquity’

Self-employed barristers prosecuting cases deserve parity with lawyers employed by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the Bar Council has said.

Earlier this month, the civil service trade union, the FDA, negotiated a 10% pay rise for CPS Crown Prosecutors; increases of up to 8% for prosecutors, professionals and senior managers; and a 13.5% increase in overtime rates. The rises will be paid over the course of two years.

FDA national officer Steven Littlewood said the pay rise was a ‘well overdue reward for long-serving staff, who have been trapped in the lower ends of pay ranges for years’.

Richard Atkins QC, chair of the Bar Council, said he was pleased for CPS lawyers.

‘This, however, is in stark contrast to the failure to increase the levels of pay for the self-employed members of the Bar who provide an essential public service prosecuting the vast majority of the serious cases tried in the Crown Court,’ he said.

‘The pay scheme under which self-employed barristers are remunerated has had no increases since its inception in 2001 (and has therefore been eroded by inflation) and actually suffered a 5% cut in 2012. There can be no justification for one part of the system to receive a pay increase whilst another part is ignored.

‘The Bar Council looks to the Director of Public Prosecutions to address this iniquity as a matter of urgency.’

Meanwhile, Criminal Bar chair Chris Henley QC, in his Monday Message, described fees for prosecuting as ‘appalling, bordering on the financially immoral, and in many instances pound for pound lower than they were 20 years ago’.

Henley said he received a message from a head of chambers last week that two barristers had just resigned—a senior and a middle ranking junior. Both had left the Bar ‘because the cuts have made the future entirely unsustainable’.

Issue: 7833 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

National military team expands in Leeds with legal director appointment

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Disputes and investigations team welcomes product liability partner hire

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

London firm launches employment department with four-lawyer team hire

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll