header-logo header-logo

22 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar Council chooses Brimelow as 2025 vice chair

Criminal and human rights practitioner Kirsty Brimelow KC has been elected vice chair of the Bar Council for 2025 

Brimelow, of Doughty Street Chambers, was called to the bar in 1991, took silk in 2011 and was appointed as a recorder in 2022 and deputy High Court judge in 2021.

She was vice chair and chair of the Criminal Bar Association in 2021–23 during the barrister strikes and subsequent negotiations with the government over legal aid fees.

She also led the drafting which resulted in the introduction of FGM Protection Order legislation.

Her work nationally and internationally led to the UN resolution on the Elimination of Harmful Practices Related to Accusations of Witchcraft and Ritual Attacks. Between 2019 and 2021, Kirsty advised the government of Denmark on consent-based sexual offences, leading to a change in the law.

Her work as a mediator includes negotiating an historic apology from the former president of Colombia to a community of cacao farmers.

She will join Barbara Mills KC and Lucinda Orr next year to make up the first all-female officer team in the Bar Council’s 130-year history.

Brimelow said: ‘As we move through the election year, I am committed to taking justice off the political football field and returning it to a properly resourced, accessible and respected pillar of society.’

Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll