header-logo header-logo

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

Bar Council urges caution on Police Bill

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill ‘limits fundamental civic rights’, the Bar Council has warned in its briefing to MPs.

The controversial Bill, which is currently at committee stage, covers a range of protest, policing and sentencing measures.

The Bar Council said the clause on ‘harassment in a public place’ would essentially render annoying speech a criminal offence, and went further than the current law, while proposals to criminalise damage to war memorials could create situations where simply removing a bunch of flowers led to proceedings in the Crown Court. It warned the Bill would allow the government to prevent protests it didn’t agree with and give ‘expansive powers to the police, which encompass the arrest of one individual who is independently protesting’.

It said: ‘There are clear tensions between the Bill and the freedom of protest and expression protected under the European Convention on Human Rights.’

It also opposed any legislation allowing for remote juries, which it said would make jurors ‘spectators rather than participants in a trial’.

See below for Michael Zander QC's three-part series on the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll