header-logo header-logo

Barnardo’s loses pension switch appeal

10 November 2016
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pension schemes cannot switch retail prices index (RPI) increases for consumer prices index (CPI), the Court of Appeal has held.

Under the 1988 rules of the Barnardo’s pension scheme, pensioners are entitled to annual increases. Barnardo’s v Buckinghamshire [2016] EWCA Civ 1064 concerned whether the trustees of the scheme had the power to replace the RPI measurement of these increases with the CPI or some other index. This would significantly reduce the deficit in the fund but also significantly reduce pensioners’ future annual increases.

The court held that the trustees did not have the power to do this. It also commented that s 67 of the Pensions Act 1995, which protects members’ rights, would not prevent a change of index if the trustees did have the power to make the change.

Fuat Sami, partner at Sackers, said the decision would “continue to leave employers and trustees, who have been grappling with this issue, in an unsatisfactory place.”

Sami explained the court had held that the scheme’s deed does not afford the trustees the ability to select the index by which increases are measured.

“Unless the government moves to consult more widely on amending primary legislation…the ability of schemes to switch from RPI to CPI will continue to depend on how the scheme rules were originally drafted many years ago—it is essentially a lottery,” he said.

“Even for schemes which have clear in-built discretions to switch to another index, more uncertainty lies ahead for both employers and trustees as to whether this is permissible under the legislation.”

Issue: 7722 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll