header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barrister accidentally emailed private documents

A barrister has escaped immediate sanction for emailing confidential annexes attached to a judgment to a person on work experience as well as their chambers marketing team, which then posted them on the chambers’ website.

The identities of all parties in the case have been concealed.

Dame Victoria Sharp, president of the King’s Bench Division, handing down judgment last week in Re a barrister, which was held in private, said the breaches could be treated as contempt of court but were ‘not intentional’ and no further action need be taken. The barrister had explained and apologised to the court and intended to report themselves to the Bar Standards Board.

Last February, the Court of Appeal Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, warned those who broke embargoes on judgments could expect to find themselves the subject of contempt of court proceedings, after Matrix Chambers posted a judgment on its website a day early.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll