header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barrister accidentally emailed private documents

A barrister has escaped immediate sanction for emailing confidential annexes attached to a judgment to a person on work experience as well as their chambers marketing team, which then posted them on the chambers’ website.

The identities of all parties in the case have been concealed.

Dame Victoria Sharp, president of the King’s Bench Division, handing down judgment last week in Re a barrister, which was held in private, said the breaches could be treated as contempt of court but were ‘not intentional’ and no further action need be taken. The barrister had explained and apologised to the court and intended to report themselves to the Bar Standards Board.

Last February, the Court of Appeal Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, warned those who broke embargoes on judgments could expect to find themselves the subject of contempt of court proceedings, after Matrix Chambers posted a judgment on its website a day early.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll