header-logo header-logo

23 February 2022
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Respect embargo or risk contempt

Breaches of embargo on publication of the contents of a court judgment are ‘becoming more frequent’, the Court of Appeal has warned

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, giving the main judgment, promised tough action on future breaches, while acknowledging that mistakes happen, in R (on the application of the Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181, All ER (D) 79 (Feb).

The draft judgment in the case was sent by the judge’s clerk to counsel’s clerks at Matrix Chambers, with the statement that the draft was confidential and disclosure may be treated as contempt of court. However, a Matrix press release was uploaded too early, appearing on the chambers’ website, LinkedIn and Twitter. It was taken down as soon as the error was discovered and the senior practice manager at Matrix alerted the judge to the mistake, which she said occurred due to a ‘miscommunication’ within chambers.

Sir Geoffrey said: ‘I should say that I have called this case into court because, amongst other reasons, the breaches that occurred here are not alone.

‘I have become aware formally and informally of other breaches in other cases. It seems, anecdotally at least, that violations of the embargo on publicising either the content or the substance of draft judgments are becoming more frequent.

‘The purpose of this judgment is not to castigate those whose inadvertent oversights gave rise to the breaches in this case, but to send a clear message to all those who receive embargoed judgments in advance of hand-down that the embargo must be respected. In future, those who break embargoes can expect to find themselves the subject of contempt proceedings as paragraph 2.8 of CPR PD40E envisages.’

Concluding, he said it was not appropriate for persons in the clerks’ rooms or offices of chambers to see the draft judgment or be given a summary of its contents, and drafting press releases was not a legitimate activity to undertake within the embargo. He suggested one named clerk provide the link between the court and the barristers, and that chambers and solicitors put ‘proper precautions and double-checks’ in place to catch errors in time.

Issue: 7968 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll