header-logo header-logo

22 March 2017
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barrister fined over data protection breach

A barrister has been fined £1,000 for failing to keep clients’ sensitive information secure, after her husband updated software on the couple’s home computer.

The husband’s action resulted in information belonging to 250 people, including vulnerable adults and children involved in Family Court and Court of Protection proceedings, being uploaded to the internet. Some 725 unencrypted documents, which were created and stored on the computer, were temporarily uploaded to an internet directory as a back-up during the software upgrade.

According to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the information was visible to an internet search engine and some of the documents could be easily accessed through a simple search.

Steve Eckersley, head of enforcement at the ICO, said: “This barrister, for no good reason, overlooked her responsibility to protect her clients’ confidential and highly sensitive information.

“It is hard to imagine the distress this could have caused to the people involved—even if the worst never happened, this barrister exposed her clients to unnecessary worry and upset.” 

Issue: 7739 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll