header-logo header-logo

01 July 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers on strike

Hundreds of fully robed barristers gathered outside the Old Bailey with placards this week, as the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) strike action began

Criminal barristers also protested outside Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Bristol and Cardiff Crown Courts, bringing work at all six courts to a halt. The barristers are refusing to take on new cases and continuing to ‘refuse returns’―the initial protest action they began two months ago.

Addressing the wigged and gowned crowd outside the Old Bailey, Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Last year we lost another 300 criminal barristers. Why? Because they could not do this job any more on what they were being paid and for the hours that they were toiling.

‘This must come to an end, and it will if this government is prepared to sit down with us and negotiate. We cannot continue to work like this.’

The scale of the walkouts will escalate by an extra day each week until, by late July, full ‘weeks of action’ are taking place on alternative weeks.

The CBA is asking for a 25% increase in legal aid fees and wants the government to ‘at least’ implement with immediate application to ongoing cases the minimum 15% increase recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review.

Justice Secretary Dominic Raab, in a tweeted statement, condemned the strike as ‘regrettable… given only 43.5% of their members voted for this particular, most disruptive, option’, and urged them to ‘agree the proposed 15% pay rise which would see a typical barrister earn £7,000 more a year’.

However, the CBA has pointed out the increase, which would apply to cases beginning from October, would not reach barristers’ pockets until late 2023/2024, as fees are paid on completion of the case. Among junior barristers, median earnings are £12,200.

A total of 2,055 criminal barristers voted in a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot. The results, announced last week, show 81.5% (1,675 barristers) supported days of action, of which 43.5% of the total (894 barristers) chose the most disruptive option (days of action combined with ‘no returns’ and refusing new instructions).
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll