header-logo header-logo

01 July 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers on strike

Hundreds of fully robed barristers gathered outside the Old Bailey with placards this week, as the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) strike action began

Criminal barristers also protested outside Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Bristol and Cardiff Crown Courts, bringing work at all six courts to a halt. The barristers are refusing to take on new cases and continuing to ‘refuse returns’―the initial protest action they began two months ago.

Addressing the wigged and gowned crowd outside the Old Bailey, Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Last year we lost another 300 criminal barristers. Why? Because they could not do this job any more on what they were being paid and for the hours that they were toiling.

‘This must come to an end, and it will if this government is prepared to sit down with us and negotiate. We cannot continue to work like this.’

The scale of the walkouts will escalate by an extra day each week until, by late July, full ‘weeks of action’ are taking place on alternative weeks.

The CBA is asking for a 25% increase in legal aid fees and wants the government to ‘at least’ implement with immediate application to ongoing cases the minimum 15% increase recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review.

Justice Secretary Dominic Raab, in a tweeted statement, condemned the strike as ‘regrettable… given only 43.5% of their members voted for this particular, most disruptive, option’, and urged them to ‘agree the proposed 15% pay rise which would see a typical barrister earn £7,000 more a year’.

However, the CBA has pointed out the increase, which would apply to cases beginning from October, would not reach barristers’ pockets until late 2023/2024, as fees are paid on completion of the case. Among junior barristers, median earnings are £12,200.

A total of 2,055 criminal barristers voted in a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot. The results, announced last week, show 81.5% (1,675 barristers) supported days of action, of which 43.5% of the total (894 barristers) chose the most disruptive option (days of action combined with ‘no returns’ and refusing new instructions).
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll