header-logo header-logo

Battle of Britain

10 April 2015 / Phillip Patterson
Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Phillip Patterson provides a commentary on the Al Sweady Inquiry

Shortly before Christmas, the 1,250 page report by Sir Thayne Forbes following the £31m Al Sweady Public Inquiry was laid before Parliament. The Inquiry considered some of the most serious allegations levelled at British troops since the Second World War. Although the report identified some instances of ill-treatment within the evidence, it will be viewed as a powerful and vociferous exoneration of the military.  

Battle of Danny Boy

The events with which the inquiry was concerned began on 14 May 2004 with what the military named, the Battle of Danny Boy. In the eyes of the military, the Battle of Danny Boy represented a great success, in which infantry soldiers from the Princess of Wales’ Royal Regiment and the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders overcame a large, co-ordinated and deadly ambush by the Mahdi Army on their patrol. On the military account of events, 28 armed insurgents were killed in the battle and nine armed insurgents were taken prisoner and detained in British-run facilities until September of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll