header-logo header-logo

10 April 2015 / Phillip Patterson
Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Battle of Britain

Phillip Patterson provides a commentary on the Al Sweady Inquiry

Shortly before Christmas, the 1,250 page report by Sir Thayne Forbes following the £31m Al Sweady Public Inquiry was laid before Parliament. The Inquiry considered some of the most serious allegations levelled at British troops since the Second World War. Although the report identified some instances of ill-treatment within the evidence, it will be viewed as a powerful and vociferous exoneration of the military.  

Battle of Danny Boy

The events with which the inquiry was concerned began on 14 May 2004 with what the military named, the Battle of Danny Boy. In the eyes of the military, the Battle of Danny Boy represented a great success, in which infantry soldiers from the Princess of Wales’ Royal Regiment and the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders overcame a large, co-ordinated and deadly ambush by the Mahdi Army on their patrol. On the military account of events, 28 armed insurgents were killed in the battle and nine armed insurgents were taken prisoner and detained in British-run facilities until September

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll