header-logo header-logo

Battle of UniLaw

24 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Patents , Profession
printer mail-detail
The University of Law has lost the main parts of a trademark case against one of its former law students over the mark ‘UniLaw’

Uni Excellence is a business helping aspiring lawyers and doctors choose the best law and medical schools. It owns the trade marks ‘UniLaw’ and ‘UniMed’, which it registered in March 2019.

The University of Law, which own the trade marks ‘ULaw’ and ‘University of Law’ filed an opposition with the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), on the grounds the marks were too similar―bringing it into opposition with its own former student, Virginia Szepietowski, a co-founder of Uni Excellence who, ironically, helped promote the University of Law to her clients.

However, the IPO found there was ‘simply not enough similarity between the applicant’s UniLaw marks and the sign University of Law for there to be misrepresentation and/or deception’.

Its judgment stated: ‘The opponent is seeking to unfairly monopolise the words “university”, and any abbreviation of that work, and the word “law”.’ It ordered the University to pay Uni Excellence £2,700 in costs.

Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Patents , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll