header-logo header-logo

24 November 2020
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Patents , Profession
printer mail-detail

Battle of UniLaw

The University of Law has lost the main parts of a trademark case against one of its former law students over the mark ‘UniLaw’

Uni Excellence is a business helping aspiring lawyers and doctors choose the best law and medical schools. It owns the trade marks ‘UniLaw’ and ‘UniMed’, which it registered in March 2019.

The University of Law, which own the trade marks ‘ULaw’ and ‘University of Law’ filed an opposition with the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), on the grounds the marks were too similar―bringing it into opposition with its own former student, Virginia Szepietowski, a co-founder of Uni Excellence who, ironically, helped promote the University of Law to her clients.

However, the IPO found there was ‘simply not enough similarity between the applicant’s UniLaw marks and the sign University of Law for there to be misrepresentation and/or deception’.

Its judgment stated: ‘The opponent is seeking to unfairly monopolise the words “university”, and any abbreviation of that work, and the word “law”.’ It ordered the University to pay Uni Excellence £2,700 in costs.

Issue: 7912 / Categories: Legal News , Patents , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll