header-logo header-logo

Baynes v Hedger & anor: a lesson for charities?

15 October 2009 / Emily Campbell
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Tax , Family
printer mail-detail

Emily Campbell highlights potential pitfalls in processing inheritance claims

Charities are often in the position of defending claims by alleged dependants, brought in respect of the estate of a deceased in which charity is interested.

These claims are made under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975). For this reason, charities will find the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Baynes v Hedger & anor [2009] EWCA Civ 374, [2009] 2 FLR 767 affirming [2008] EWHC 1587 (Ch), [2008] 2 FLR 1805 of particular interest.

This article considers claims brought by alleged dependants under I(PFD)A 1975 following that decision, with an emphasis on points of interest to charities.

The facts of the case are unusual. The scene was set in an English country house, Dunshay Manor in Dorset. The deceased was a well-known sculptress, Mary Spencer Watson, whose father had been a portrait painter and Fellow of the Royal Academy and whose mother had been a mime artist.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll