header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009 / Emily Campbell
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Tax , Family
printer mail-detail

Baynes v Hedger & anor: a lesson for charities?

Emily Campbell highlights potential pitfalls in processing inheritance claims

Charities are often in the position of defending claims by alleged dependants, brought in respect of the estate of a deceased in which charity is interested.

These claims are made under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975). For this reason, charities will find the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Baynes v Hedger & anor [2009] EWCA Civ 374, [2009] 2 FLR 767 affirming [2008] EWHC 1587 (Ch), [2008] 2 FLR 1805 of particular interest.

This article considers claims brought by alleged dependants under I(PFD)A 1975 following that decision, with an emphasis on points of interest to charities.

The facts of the case are unusual. The scene was set in an English country house, Dunshay Manor in Dorset. The deceased was a well-known sculptress, Mary Spencer Watson, whose father had been a portrait painter and Fellow of the Royal Academy and whose mother had been a mime artist.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll