header-logo header-logo

Baynes v Hedger & anor: a lesson for charities?

15 October 2009 / Emily Campbell
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Tax , Family
printer mail-detail

Emily Campbell highlights potential pitfalls in processing inheritance claims

Charities are often in the position of defending claims by alleged dependants, brought in respect of the estate of a deceased in which charity is interested.

These claims are made under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975). For this reason, charities will find the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Baynes v Hedger & anor [2009] EWCA Civ 374, [2009] 2 FLR 767 affirming [2008] EWHC 1587 (Ch), [2008] 2 FLR 1805 of particular interest.

This article considers claims brought by alleged dependants under I(PFD)A 1975 following that decision, with an emphasis on points of interest to charities.

The facts of the case are unusual. The scene was set in an English country house, Dunshay Manor in Dorset. The deceased was a well-known sculptress, Mary Spencer Watson, whose father had been a portrait painter and Fellow of the Royal Academy and whose mother had been a mime artist.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll