header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008 / David Ingall
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Be prepared!

Paying less for your professional indemnity insurance is within your grasp, says David Ingall

Whether you like it or not professional indemnity insurance is a compulsory requirement of practising as a solicitor. It can be expensive, intrusive and a constant reminder of our own shortcomings, but we are grateful it is there when things go wrong.

Information provided by Lockton, a specialist professional indemnity broker to the legal profession, suggests that larger firms (typically eight-partner plus and probably £8m of fees) in the last round of renewals paid premiums of 1.1% of fees and smaller firms (typically £1.8m of fees) paid premiums of 2.3% of fees. This, of course, takes no account of levels of cover or excesses. While each firm is assessed on a case by case basis, this sampling supports the information gathered in the UK200 Legal Group survey.

Reinventing the Renewal Process

There is an immense variation in the marketplace and there are signs that premiums will harden (the polite euphemism

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll