header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Desmond Kilcoyne , Adam Colenso
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Be reasonable

Practitioners should prepare carefully before making LTA 1985 dispensation applications, say Adam Colenso and Desmond Kilcoyne

Before a landlord carries out costly works on a building in which there are residential leaseholders, the leaseholders are entitled to be consulted about two matters: first, the nature of the proposed works; and, second, the identity of, and likely cost to be charged by, the contractor to be engaged. However, a landlord can avoid consultation if he obtains a “dispensation” from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT). A landmark decision of the Lands Tribunal now provides guidance as to how such applications for dispensation are to be approached.

The statutory consultation scheme has undergone change in recent years. New ss 20 and 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) were introduced by s 151 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) ss 20/20ZA. Section 20 sets out the consultation requirements with which a landlord must comply by reference to the detailed provisions of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll