header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Desmond Kilcoyne , Adam Colenso
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Be reasonable

Practitioners should prepare carefully before making LTA 1985 dispensation applications, say Adam Colenso and Desmond Kilcoyne

Before a landlord carries out costly works on a building in which there are residential leaseholders, the leaseholders are entitled to be consulted about two matters: first, the nature of the proposed works; and, second, the identity of, and likely cost to be charged by, the contractor to be engaged. However, a landlord can avoid consultation if he obtains a “dispensation” from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT). A landmark decision of the Lands Tribunal now provides guidance as to how such applications for dispensation are to be approached.

The statutory consultation scheme has undergone change in recent years. New ss 20 and 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) were introduced by s 151 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) ss 20/20ZA. Section 20 sets out the consultation requirements with which a landlord must comply by reference to the detailed provisions of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll