header-logo header-logo

Historic Act will transform employment rights landscape

The government’s landmark Employment Rights Act 2025 met its pre-Christmas deadline, ushering in sweeping changes to the law

The Act, which received royal assent last month, immediately repealed the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023. This controversial minimum services legislation, which was never used and which was vigorously opposed by trade unions, gave employers powers to compel striking workers back to work in health and other critical sectors by issuing ‘work notices’.

The other provisions of the Employment Rights Act will come into force in the next two years. In April, paternity and parental leave will become a ‘day one’ right, and statutory sick pay will be paid from the first not the fourth day of illness.

More reforms will be introduced in October 2026—the end of ‘fire and rehire’ policies, employer liability for harassment from third parties, tipping laws, and employment tribunal limitation extending from three months to six months.

In January 2027, the law will change to protect employees from unfair dismissal after six months instead of the current two years.

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak described the passing of the Act as ‘a landmark day for millions of workers’.

The government said the Act would allow 32,000 more dads and partners each year to take paternity leave and 1.5m more parents to take unpaid parental leave, while up to 1.3 million low-paid employees would now be able to take sick days thanks to statutory sick pay reforms, and up to 2.7 million employees a year would gain a right to bereavement leave.

However, James Townsend, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, said: ‘At a time where employers are already facing ever-increasing numbers of claims, rather than re-balancing the existing framework by placing further burdens on business, the government would have been better focused on modernising dispute resolution practices to cut current delays in cases being heard and re-introducing industrial juries, which were previously abolished in favour of judges sitting alone in the majority of cases.

‘Making a sensible reversal of earlier government policy on industrial juries would have brought back workplace reality and common sense to the employment tribunal system.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll