header-logo header-logo

Begging your pardon

11 July 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

In the UK, it is the courts & not the government that determines a person’s guilt, explains Athelstane Aamodt

Every Thanksgiving, the president of the United States ‘pardons’ a turkey. Unsurprisingly, there is no enumerated power for the president to do so in the US Constitution; it is merely a tradition.

The president does, however, have the power to pardon people; at Art II, s 2 of the US Constitution, it states that ‘... he [the President] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.’ This power to reprieve and pardon has been used to varying degrees by presidents; Barack Obama pardoned 212 people and commuted the sentences of 1,715 people, although this pales into insignificance when compared with Andrew Johnson (Lincoln’s successor as president), who pardoned over 8,000 people—most of them ex-Confederates, including Jefferson Davis.

The president’s powers under the constitution are broad, and attempts to have the courts interfere have proved almost entirely unsuccessful. The Supreme Court has held that the president’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll