header-logo header-logo

Begging your pardon

11 July 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

In the UK, it is the courts & not the government that determines a person’s guilt, explains Athelstane Aamodt

Every Thanksgiving, the president of the United States ‘pardons’ a turkey. Unsurprisingly, there is no enumerated power for the president to do so in the US Constitution; it is merely a tradition.

The president does, however, have the power to pardon people; at Art II, s 2 of the US Constitution, it states that ‘... he [the President] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.’ This power to reprieve and pardon has been used to varying degrees by presidents; Barack Obama pardoned 212 people and commuted the sentences of 1,715 people, although this pales into insignificance when compared with Andrew Johnson (Lincoln’s successor as president), who pardoned over 8,000 people—most of them ex-Confederates, including Jefferson Davis.

The president’s powers under the constitution are broad, and attempts to have the courts interfere have proved almost entirely unsuccessful. The Supreme Court has held that the president’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll