header-logo header-logo

11 July 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Begging your pardon

In the UK, it is the courts & not the government that determines a person’s guilt, explains Athelstane Aamodt

Every Thanksgiving, the president of the United States ‘pardons’ a turkey. Unsurprisingly, there is no enumerated power for the president to do so in the US Constitution; it is merely a tradition.

The president does, however, have the power to pardon people; at Art II, s 2 of the US Constitution, it states that ‘... he [the President] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.’ This power to reprieve and pardon has been used to varying degrees by presidents; Barack Obama pardoned 212 people and commuted the sentences of 1,715 people, although this pales into insignificance when compared with Andrew Johnson (Lincoln’s successor as president), who pardoned over 8,000 people—most of them ex-Confederates, including Jefferson Davis.

The president’s powers under the constitution are broad, and attempts to have the courts interfere have proved almost entirely unsuccessful. The Supreme Court has held that the president’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll