header-logo header-logo

Bellwether: boom plateaus as firms urged to invest more in tech

17 May 2022
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
After some challenging years, solicitors are starting to feel the benefits of the tough decisions they made to survive, the latest LexisNexis Bellwether report has found

The 10th anniversary edition of the Bellwether, titled ‘Transformation troubles’, suggests the post-lockdown boom has continued into 2022. 91% of the 345 small firms and solo practitioners interviewed expressed confidence in the future of their firm while one third have outperformed revenue expectations.

However, the post-pandemic growth boom may be plateauing and the pressures of running a law practice continue to evolve. Just over half of respondents said they were growing―a slip from two-thirds in 2021 and 57% in 2019. Recruiting and retaining good lawyers was cited as a top three challenge by half the respondents.

Four out of five respondents reported their professional indemnity insurance costs have increased. PII and salaries were the most significant operational costs in the past 12 months, while technology spend was also high at 34%.

These pressures may partly explain why the number of firms actively open to a merger or acquisition has climbed to 21% from 14% since 2021.

Some firms are tackling these challenges by investing in cloud-based tech to drive efficiencies and win more business―more than one third have already done so and almost one quarter plan to do so. On the other hand, 47% have no plans to invest in tech and nearly three-quarters still use Google for research and guidance (even though 63% of the survey acknowledged this was riskier and slower than using legal tech).

The divide in the industry continues when looking at business generation activities and ways of working. Only 46% are investing in their marketing spend and 55% are developing a social media strategy. While firms overall coped well with the switch to remote working during lockdown, almost 50% are now insisting their teams come into the office five days a week.

Rakhee Patel, senior marketing manager and the report’s author, said: ‘It is wonderful to see that the industry has found its feet again after such a challenging period. 

‘But with continued challenges with recruitment and business generation, firms must be open to embracing new technologies so that they can survive, grow and thrive.’

Read the report here.

Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll