header-logo header-logo

Bellwether reveals fee concerns

20 June 2018
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7798_news

Three out of five solicitors at small firms believe the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is acting against their interests on client fees and potentially causing significant risks, according to the 2018 Bellwether Report.

The SRA confirmed last week that it has agreed proposals to make firms publish pricing information for certain mainstream services and display a badge highlighting consumer protections on their website—it has dropped plans to publish details of client complaints against law firms. The ‘Better Information’ proposal will now go forward to the Legal Services Board for approval and could be in pace as early as December 2018.

This year’s LexisNexis Bellwether Report, however, found widespread dismay among solicitors, with many believing the proposal would ‘degrade the profession’s image’ and ‘encourage lower standards’ due to the potential for some legal providers to feel pressured to cut quality for cost.

Meanwhile, about 700 new law firms are opening each year and the balance of power has tipped in favour of the client, who can shop around on price comparison websites and expects their solicitor to act more like a service provider as a result. While 97% of solicitors agree that a client-first culture is important to the success of their firms, there was concern that the client-centred culture could have a negative impact on fee structures. Some 58% agreed, and a quarter disagreed, that ‘today’s price/customer driven culture is impacting on lawyers being able to uphold the integrity of the law’. When asked for the reason for their answer, 26% said ‘reducing costs at expense of quality’, five per cent said ‘client doesn’t realise skills dropping’ and three per cent said ‘encourages unethical practices’.

Nevertheless, the report reveals a bullish attitude among solicitors—87% are confident about what the future will bring for their firms and for their area of practice. When asked about their future plans, nearly three-quarters said growth was their primary focus. This result is consistent with previous Bellwether Reports, which began in 2013. However, the report notes: ‘Plans for growth have been on the cards for five years, but only marginal gains have been achieved in that time.’

The respondents named their top three challenges as attracting new business, keeping up to date with industry changes and the continuing demands of compliance regulations.

 

Issue: 7798 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll