header-logo header-logo

Belsner v CAM heads to court

05 October 2022
Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Legal services
printer mail-detail
The Court of Appeal began hearing the—previously interrupted—‘costs case of the decade’ this week.

Belsner v CAM Legal Services could have a major impact on personal injury costs, and concerns informed consent and fiduciary duties owed before a retainer is agreed.

Kain Knight Costs Lawyers are acting for the appellant, CAM. Checkmylegalfees.com is acting for the respondent, Darya Belsner.

The case was originally due to proceed in February but was adjourned after a day’s hearing and ordered to be heard again from scratch in July, with the Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos stating it concerned matters of ‘very great significance… not just to this case… but to the development of the civil justice system’.

In July, the case was adjourned again after one of the barristers caught COVID-19.

Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll