header-logo header-logo

Belsner v CAM heads to court

05 October 2022
Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Legal services
printer mail-detail
The Court of Appeal began hearing the—previously interrupted—‘costs case of the decade’ this week.

Belsner v CAM Legal Services could have a major impact on personal injury costs, and concerns informed consent and fiduciary duties owed before a retainer is agreed.

Kain Knight Costs Lawyers are acting for the appellant, CAM. Checkmylegalfees.com is acting for the respondent, Darya Belsner.

The case was originally due to proceed in February but was adjourned after a day’s hearing and ordered to be heard again from scratch in July, with the Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Vos stating it concerned matters of ‘very great significance… not just to this case… but to the development of the civil justice system’.

In July, the case was adjourned again after one of the barristers caught COVID-19.

Issue: 7997 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll