header-logo header-logo

Benefit & burden

15 July 2010 / Steven Friel , Caroline Bell
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Steven Friel & Caroline Bell discuss the changing nature of disclosure in civil procedure

We live in a technological age where there are many different forms of electronic communication and voluminous quantities of data are produced, exchanged and stored by electronic means. This can be a benefit and a burden to parties complying with their disclosure obligations in civil litigation.
Documents can make or break a case in more ways than one. They can make a case by the evidential weight they bring to bear; many a litigator lies awake at night dreaming of the smoking gun. Equally, documents can break a case with the financial strain disclosure brings to the costs of litigation. These points are particularly apt when it comes to electronic documents. There are many new and innovative e-disclosure tools on the market that greatly assist in complex cases, for example large scale commercial fraud. However, these tools, which are gradually becoming more and more necessary to the way in which we handle complex cases, come at a price, and many

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll