header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 July 2010 / Steven Friel , Caroline Bell
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Benefit & burden

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Steven Friel & Caroline Bell discuss the changing nature of disclosure in civil procedure

We live in a technological age where there are many different forms of electronic communication and voluminous quantities of data are produced, exchanged and stored by electronic means. This can be a benefit and a burden to parties complying with their disclosure obligations in civil litigation.
Documents can make or break a case in more ways than one. They can make a case by the evidential weight they bring to bear; many a litigator lies awake at night dreaming of the smoking gun. Equally, documents can break a case with the financial strain disclosure brings to the costs of litigation. These points are particularly apt when it comes to electronic documents. There are many new and innovative e-disclosure tools on the market that greatly assist in complex cases, for example large scale commercial fraud. However, these tools, which are gradually becoming more and more necessary to the way in which we handle complex cases, come at a price, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll