header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Benefit matters

How relevant are benefits payments to employment tribunal cases? Michael Salter & Chris Bryden report

The government announced it is determined to move more than one million people off benefits. However, the prevailing economic situation, which has resulted in the demise of such large chains as Woolworths, Adams and Zavvi, as well as the large number of small businesses which go under everyday, may mean that the reversal of reliance on benefits hoped for by the government is unachievable, and is likely in fact to result in an increase in the number of people claiming benefits.

The quantum of benefits received by a claimant in an employment tribunal claim is relevant to the determination of the amount of any award made, as benefits will be taken into account. When dealing with compensation for unfair dismissal, the calculation of the basic award should be relatively uncontroversial and is merely a matter of mathematics. However, more difficulties arise when assessing the compensatory award. Given the likely rise in the number of claims involving dismissal and the lack of prospects for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll