header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Benefit matters

How relevant are benefits payments to employment tribunal cases? Michael Salter & Chris Bryden report

The government announced it is determined to move more than one million people off benefits. However, the prevailing economic situation, which has resulted in the demise of such large chains as Woolworths, Adams and Zavvi, as well as the large number of small businesses which go under everyday, may mean that the reversal of reliance on benefits hoped for by the government is unachievable, and is likely in fact to result in an increase in the number of people claiming benefits.

The quantum of benefits received by a claimant in an employment tribunal claim is relevant to the determination of the amount of any award made, as benefits will be taken into account. When dealing with compensation for unfair dismissal, the calculation of the basic award should be relatively uncontroversial and is merely a matter of mathematics. However, more difficulties arise when assessing the compensatory award. Given the likely rise in the number of claims involving dismissal and the lack of prospects for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll