header-logo header-logo

Bereavement damages for cohabiting couples

19 May 2020
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail
A draft remedial order to make bereavement damages available to cohabiting couples of two years or more as well as parents, spouses and civil partners has been welcomed by the parliamentary Human Rights Committee

However, MPs and peers on the committee warned the bereavement damages scheme could be susceptible to further human rights challenges. They suggested removing the two-year requirement and removing references to ‘illegitimate children’. They warned the order might also be discriminatory against close family members.

The draft Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (Remedial) Order 2020 aims to correct a gap in the law identified by the Court of Appeal in 2017, Smith v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals [2017] EWCA Civ 1916, where it held the denial of damages to a claimant whose cohabiting partner of 11 years died was a breach of their right to private and family life.

In a situation where a cohabitant and a spouse are eligible, the draft order splits the award equally. The committee was concerned this could lead to unfairness.

Issue: 7887 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll