header-logo header-logo

Bereavement damages reform

23 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have been asked for their views on a draft Remedial Order to extend bereavement damages to co-habiting couples
Currently, under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, bereavement damages are only available to the spouse or civil partner of the deceased, or, where the deceased is an unmarried and unpartnered minor, to their parents or, where the deceased is ‘not a legitimate’ minor, to their mother.

In 2017, the Court of Appeal held the Act incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights as it denied bereavement damages to co-habiting partners who had been living together for at least two years before one of the partners died, in Smith v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 1916.

The government laid the draft Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (Remedial) Order 2020 remedying the incompatibility on 12 February. It proposes to make bereavement damages available to co-habitants who lived with the deceased for at least two years prior to the death, and, where the deceased is separated but not divorced, to divide the award equally between the cohabitant and spouse.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has to report to Parliament on whether the draft Order should be approved. It invites submissions from interested parties of no more than 1,500 words by 3 April.

To respond please visit: https://bit.ly/3bijby4

Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll