header-logo header-logo

29 September 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Bereavement reform for cohabitees

Cohabiting partners will be entitled to a bereavement payment along with married partners next week, following a change to the Fatal Accident Act
Under the 1976 Act, a statutory payment of £12,980 is made where a spouse dies as a result of negligence. From 6 October, the Act extends its scope to include a ‘cohabiting partner of the deceased living in the same household immediately before the date of death, and… for at least two years before that date’.

The reform is the result of the landmark case of Smith v Lancashire teaching Hospitals [2017] EWCA Civ 1916, when Jacqueline Smith, represented by Slater & Gordon, was told she didn’t qualify for a payment because she was not married to her partner of 16 years.

The Court of Appeal made a declaration of incompatibility on the basis the category restriction contravened Art 14 in conjunction with Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll