header-logo header-logo

28 October 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Berkeley Rowe—litigation hires

Berkeley Rowe bolsters litigation team with series of hires

International corporate and commercial law firm Berkeley Rowe has added two litigators to its growing team.

Senior associate, Daniel Roberts joins from Smithfield Partners, while associate Jonathan Bennett joins from Slaughter & May.

Daniel Roberts has worked on a wide range of contentious matters including advising both companies and individuals in commercial disputes, from the County Court to the Court of Appeal. These include cases relating to breach of directors’ duties, civil fraud, insolvency, professional negligence, contractual disputes, debt recovery, costs assessments and ADR.

Jonathan Bennett works on a wide range of contentious matters, including breach of contract, company and shareholder disputes, corporate/M&A disputes, enforcement injunctions, debt claims, insolvency disputes, data theft, privacy and breach of confidence and civil fraud.

Jonathan also has property litigation experience, including landlord and tenant disputes, opposed and unopposed lease renewal proceedings, rent arrears recovery, enforcement of restrictive covenants and issues surrounding the Assets of Community Value regime.

Speaking about his appointment, Daniel Roberts said: "I am thrilled to have joined such an ambitious and dynamic team of expert litigators. I am looking forward to contributing to the firm’s continued expansion into new and exciting markets."

Jonathan Bennett said: “Berkeley Rowe is a growing, dynamic and ambitious firm with world-class litigators. It is the perfect place for me to build my litigation practice.”

The firm has also recruited two litigation paralegals and taken on two trainees.

Marc Da Costa, managing partner at Berkeley Rowe says: “After a successful year we are delighted to announce the expansion in our litigation team with these new arrivals. This expansion goes hand in hand with our growth strategy to strengthen resources and meet client demand. We are constantly looking to make our litigation team stronger, more competitive, and above all client centric.”

 

 

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll