header-logo header-logo

12 December 2025
Issue: 8143 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: A Christmas plea for speed

238298
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year

He notes that CILEX, represented pro bono by Nicholas Bacon KC, has secured permission to appeal Mazur despite neither party challenging the original decision, with Regan urging Sir Geoffrey Vos MR to hear the case for the sake of clarity and rapid judgment.

Regan also spotlights troubling behaviour in Goulden v Milne, where Judge Keyser KC condemned a solicitor’s alleged intimidatory conduct before referring the matter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Meanwhile, Sir Andrew Ritchie’s ruling in Tom James UK Ltd v Potter revives debates over restraint-of-trade clauses, and the Commercial Court decries a 20,000-page bundle in Wenda.

Regan’s festive wish is simple: faster judgments and an ‘Ozempic for bundles’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll