header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 June 2007 / Julien Allen
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Best practice

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

What does the new service charge code mean for property managers…and landlords? Julien Allen reports

Poorly managed service charges are a frequent cause of disputes between property managers and tenants. To ensure best practice is used in the property industry, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors’ Code of Practice for Service Charges in Commercial Property has been released to address this problem. The extent of its adoption remains to be seen, but the effects of its implementation look to have significant benefits for tenants and to improve their relationships with property managers.

The code came into effect on 1 April 2007, setting out best practice in the management and regulation of service charges in England and Wales. The code advises owners, occupiers and professional advisers, including lawyers, to bring existing leases into accordance with the guidelines and to modernise leases when opportunities arise, such as new lettings.

WHAT HAS CHANGED?

The new code supersedes the second edition of Service Charges in Commercial Property: A Guide to Good Practice, and has been designed to attract a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll